When I visit “collaborative” sites, e.g. for a team, a department or a project, I often find a document library called “Meetings”, or even worse, several document libraries, each for one particular meeting date. These generally contain documents for prereading, presentations from the meeting, agenda and minutes. And sometimes they have an action or decision list as well.
The good thing is that these meeting documens are now in one clear online location, and that (hopefully) sending documents via email and printing are reduced.
But now think again. It is 2013.
- Do you still store everything in document format, while there are ways to do thing directly online?
- Do you have to open multiple Meeting Minutes or Decision List documents when you are looking for that one decision from early 2012, but forgot the exact date?
- Is there still someone responsible for writing down “refer to next meeting” for several agenda items in the Meeting Minutes, and then remembering to add them to the next meeting agenda?
- Are you still emailing various draft agenda’s to your team?
- Does someone in your team have to collect the progress of the action list and recreate the new Action list?
- Do you have to chase everyone for approval of the meeting minutes?
A different approach.
It may be time to move to a simpler process. Of course there is the Meeting Workspace, but sometimes you prefer to have everything in one site. The MW will also no longer be supported in SP2013. An alternative is the Meeting-Agenda-and-Minutes List, combining agenda, meeting minutes and decisions in one list. Our team started this in about 2002 and we have happily used it for our weekly team meeting for years.
The concept is as follows:
- Everything you discuss is first an agenda item. The owner of the item creates and manages it themselves.
- All items not marked as “completed” are visible.
- The meeting owner adjusts the order of the agenda items just before the meeting.
- During the meeting, the item is discussed. We always had online meetings, so we viewed items on-screen. The item owner can adjust the item while discussing, and show the updates to the team.
- After discussing the item, the decision and date are added to the item and the status is set to “completed”.
- All completed discussions are stored in one or more “completed” views, sorted and grouped as needed.
Does it sound complicated? Let me show you the (Custom) list that I have worked with.
This is an item on the agenda:
This is the agenda, sorted on “Order” and filtered by “Status is not equal to completed”.
During the discussion, the relevant info and decision are captured in the bottom fields of the item.
This is the view that shows all items that have been discussed. You can easily filter for specific topics, regardless of meeting date. Of course you can also group on other metadata, but this view clearly shows the increased transparancy compared to Meeting Minutes in document format.
Of course you can simplify or extend the list to fit your own meeting style and goals.
What are the advantages?
- No need to send agendas via email; if everyone sets a notification you wil get a message when a new item has been added or changed.
- The meeting owner can easily adjust the order of items
- During the meeting, the item is open and any next steps can be added straight away
- When something is not discussed or no decision has taken place, it simply stays on the list. You do not have to specifically state that it is “moved to the next meeting”.
- One archive of individual decisions means you do not have to look through documents by date. Now that you have one “online database” it is much easier to find any decisions relating to your topic, since they can be found by date AND by creator AND by tag if you have used those.
- Everyone has seen the decision so there is no need to circulate any meeting minutes for approval.
Will this work for all meetings?
Of course this needs change management. If your organization is relying heavily on documents, not used to PC’s and projectors in the meeting room, or has been pampered by people sending things to them, this will be a big change that will need discussion, training and an extensive trial period.
It may be wise to measure time involved in the current meeting setup beforehand and to compare that to the new setup. This information will also help you to convince others.
For some meeting types this setup may not be appropriate. There may be legal requirements to have documents, perhaps even printed, with handwritten signatures, or some external participants may not have access to your SharePoint environment.
But for your average team, department or project group meeting, this may save lots of time!
Have you used something similar? Please share!
Note April 2013: Gene Vangampelaere shares his use of OneNote for meetings. Nice!